The dangers of crying ‘negative contribution’ in divorce proceedings - eprivateclient

James Carroll, Managing Partner in the Russell-Cooke Solicitors, family and children team.
James Carroll
1 min Read

One of the most common misconceptions in divorce is that examples of unreasonable behaviour can impact a financial settlement. In reality, this is only the case when the bad behaviour goes beyond the norm and has been truly horrific. But, this doesn't stop this idea being tested in court.

Russell-Cooke family consultant comments in eprivateclient on the example of Ms Finch who unsuccessfully tried to reduce her ex-husband's financial remedy award of 37.5% of their capital plus half of her pension.

The dangers of crying 'negative contribution' in divorce proceedings is available to read on the eprivateclient website or available for free here.

In the press Family and children Russell-Cooke family law divorce eprivateclient in the press