Dangers Funding Assumptions Russell Cooke News 2024

The dangers of funding assumptions—Solicitor’s Journal

Mark Fletcher, Partner in the Russell-Cooke Solicitors, dispute resolution team.
Mark Fletcher
1 min Read

Partner Mark Fletcher has authored an article in the Solicitor’s Journal that explores the impact of a recent Supreme Court decision on firms considering investment decisions under alternative funding arrangements.

R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) (Appellants) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others (Respondents) (PACCAR) centred on whether litigation funding agreements (LFAs) fell within the regulatory scheme for damages-based agreements (DBAs), with this regulatory scheme providing that DBAs will be unenforceable unless they comply with certain conditions. 

PACCAR shows the challenges and risks in building innovative business models for litigation… unless a client has both sufficient resources and an appetite to fully fund a claim, the provision of some form of credit in relation to the services provided will be needed."
Mark Fletcher, Partner in the Russell-Cooke Solicitors, dispute resolution team.
Mark Fletcher • Partner • Russell-Cooke
|

The full article is available to read via an online PDF by the Solicitor’s Journal. 

Mark Fletcher is in the dispute resolution team, advising individuals, charities and businesses on a wide range of disputes including on legal issues that arise on property development, construction and service delivery projects.

Get in touch

If you would like to speak with a member of the team you can contact our commercial litigation solicitors by email, by telephone on +44 (0)20 3826 7513 or +44 (0)20 3826 7516 or complete our enquiry form.

In the press Dispute resolution litigation funding funding alternative funding PACCAR supreme court decision